Crack Failures in 3D-Printed Polymer Formworks During Concrete Casting

2022-07-24 06:32:24 By : Mr. Peter Qiu

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to browse this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info.

In a pre-proof article recently published in the journal Additive Manufacturing, researchers reviewed the applications of 3D polymer formworks in architecture, focusing on failures due to formwork pressure and deriving solutions to these issues. Furthermore, the team aimed to provide a guideline for the selection of thermoplastics to fabricate 3D printed formworks.

Study: Environmental Stress Cracking of 3D-Printed Polymers Exposed to Concrete . Image Credit: ya_create/Shutterstock.com

Formworks are essential structures in most concrete casting and fabrication processes, supporting fresh concrete until hardening and thereby defining the texture, surface quality, and shape of the final material. Although formworks are versatile, reusable, and inexpensive, their application becomes limited with complex architectures.

Formworks have been fabricated mostly by various 3D printing processes like binder jetting and foam, clay extrusion, polymer, and concrete. One of the most acclaimed and widely studied methods is polymer extrusion 3D printing, or in other words, fused deposition modeling (FDM) and fused filament fabrication (FFF). This method is also known for being cheap, lightweight, and for its use of easily recyclable materials.

Despite this, FDM formworks are susceptible to casting failures, causing concrete leakage and resulting in unsuccessful casts. These failures are usually attributed to the pressure exerted on the thin plastic formworks by the concrete. Some 3D printing polymers like polylactic acid (PLA) are more vulnerable to premature failure, whereas others like acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) are reusable for up to 190 times.

This study focused on failures due to concrete pressures and their mitigation in FDM formworks. This was followed by identifying the widely used thermoplastics in FDM 3D printing and determining the structural performance of the formworks through a three-point bending test.

In this study, 18 different samples were procured including acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene + polyamide (ABS/PA), acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA), acrylonitrile styrene acrylate + hindered amine light stabilizers (ASAUV), brominated polylactic acid (bPLA), high impact polystyrene (HIPS), polylactic acid + 40% lignin (Lig), polyamide (nylon) (PA), polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene terephthalate + wax (PETW), polyethylene terephthalate, glycol-modified (PETG), PLA sourced from extrudr (PLA1), PLA sourced from Dutch Filaments (PLA2), polylactic acid + carbon fibers (PLACF), polylactic acid and co-polymers (PLA+), polylactic acid (annealed) (PLAa), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).

The team subjected the samples to mechanical tests to determine the formwork’s resistance to the hydrostatic pressure while casting. The three-point bending tests were reversed by the vertical support orientation, allowing the samples to be balanced between the support pins and the loading pin.

This enabled a horizontal surface between the support pins where a drop of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution was applied, acting as a concrete pore solution. At a load rate of 2 mm/min, a universal testing machine conducted the tests with a 1 kN load cell. This was carried out until specimen failure or the flexural strain surpassed 10%.

The results indicated that the alkaline solution significantly affected the bending strength of certain polymers followed by rapid deterioration. The annealed PLA sample exhibited inconsequential change in stiffness and strength, while short carbon fiber reinforcement resulted in a minor but measurable increase in the bending strength and elastic modulus of the PLA.

Moreover, five modes of failure were observed; material failures, slip failures, strain limit, brittle failures, and environmental stress cracking (ESC) with material failure were the most common. This is generally caused by plastic deformation and large strain leading to fractures occurring beyond the yield point.

Similarly, slip failures occurred through plastic deformation with the difference being that the fractures came from the 3D printed layers slipping along the interfaces and separating from each other. The specimen exceeding the 10% threshold for the flexural strain reached their strain limit while brittle failures occurred in the carbon fiber reinforced PLA and the annealed PLA samples. Environmental stress cracking generally leads to brittle failure, without ductile drawing from the surfaces next to the cracks. The PLA, PC, and PET samples were highly vulnerable to ESC and exhibited loss in strength in all orientations.

The team categorized the samples based on the loss of bending strength in the presence of NaOH solution: (1) Group 1 including materials unaffected by NaOH such as ASA, ABS, HIPS, PVA, and nylon, (2) Group 2 including samples displaying moderate loss of strength such as 17.8% for PETG, 51.9% for PET, and 43.8% for PC, and (3) Group 3, including materials that were substantially affected by NaOH including samples based on PLA, which could lose approximately 60-80% of their bending strength in comparison to the dry tests.

To summarize, the study findings proposed an efficient experimental setup that precisely assesses the common FDM polymer behavior employed in the formwork fabrication. While polymers like PETG, PC, PET, and PLA were susceptible to ESC, additional polymers such as ASA, ABS, nylon, HIPS, ABS/PA, and PVA displayed resistance to ESC. The authors suggest that surface irregularities could be reduced or eliminated using post-processing methods like sanding, chemical washing, polishing, bead tumbling, or sand blasting.

Andrei Jipa, Lex Reiter, Robert Flatt and Benjamin Dillenburger, Environmental Stress Cracking of 3D-Printed Polymers Exposed to Concrete, Additive Manufacturing, (2022) doi: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860422004183?via%3Dihub

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Chinmay Saraf is a science writer based in Indore, India. His academic background is in mechanical engineering, and he has extensive experience in fused deposition-based additive manufacturing. His research focuses on post-processing methods for fused deposition modeling to improve mechanical and electrical properties of 3D printed parts. He has also worked on composite 3D printing, bioprinting, and food printing technologies. Chinmay holds an M.Tech. in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing and is passionate about 3D printing, new product development, material science, and sustainability. He also has a keen interest in "Frugal Designs" to improve the existing engineering systems.  

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

Saraf, Chinmay. (2022, July 11). Crack Failures in 3D-Printed Polymer Formworks During Concrete Casting. AZoM. Retrieved on July 24, 2022 from https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=59527.

Saraf, Chinmay. "Crack Failures in 3D-Printed Polymer Formworks During Concrete Casting". AZoM. 24 July 2022. <https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=59527>.

Saraf, Chinmay. "Crack Failures in 3D-Printed Polymer Formworks During Concrete Casting". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=59527. (accessed July 24, 2022).

Saraf, Chinmay. 2022. Crack Failures in 3D-Printed Polymer Formworks During Concrete Casting. AZoM, viewed 24 July 2022, https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=59527.

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

At the Advanced Materials Show 2022, AZoM caught up with the CEO of Cambridge Smart Plastics, Andrew Terentjev. In this interview, we discuss the company's novel technologies and how they could revolutionize how we think about plastics.

At the Advanced Materials Show in June 2022, AZoM spoke with Ben Melrose from International Syalons about the advanced materials market, Industry 4.0, and efforts to move toward net-zero.

At the Advanced Materials Show, AZoM spoke with Vig Sherrill from General Graphene about the future of graphene and how their novel production technique will lower costs to open up a whole new world of applications in the future.

Discover the OTT Parsivel², a laser disdrometer that can be used to measure all precipitation types. It allows users to collect data on the size and speed of falling particles.

Environics offers stand alone permeation systems that can be used for single or multiple disposable permeation tubes.

Grabner Instruments’ MiniFlash FPA Vision Autosampler is a 12-position autosampler. It is an automated accessory designed to be used with the MINIFLASH FP Vision Analyzer.

This article provides an end-of-life assessment of lithium-ion batteries, focusing on the recycling of an ever-growing amount of spent Li-Ion batteries in order to work toward a sustainable and circular approach to battery use and reuse.

Corrosion is the degradation of an alloy caused by its exposure to the environment. Corrosion deterioration of metallic alloys exposed to the atmosphere or other adverse conditions is prevented using a variety of techniques.

Due to the ever-increasing demand for energy, the demand for nuclear fuel has also increased, which has further created a significant increase in the requirement for post-irradiation examination (PIE) techniques.

AZoM.com - An AZoNetwork Site

Owned and operated by AZoNetwork, © 2000-2022